Monday, January 20, 2025
Monday, March 14, 2022
Whatever Happened to Spartacus? (part 7)
(part1)
(part 2)
(part 3)
(part 4)
(part 5)
(part 6)
Clearly decades-long friend Spartacus was not in the least interested even in my direct answers to his coldly hostile questions... let alone the reasoning that undergirds my perspective.
He didn't want a dialog. He wanted only to attack, to beat his chest and bellow as king of the hill... while standing in a cesspit. His lifelong open-mindedness was gone; his patient manner had evaporated; his respect for others wrenched into a whip, a goad, a dagger in the back, a sickening fecal firehose on full power.
He responded the next morning to my long, sincere note, where I'd outlined areas I both in fact agreed with him on, and where his vaunted stance was weak, deficient, and unsustainable... and he would have none of it. The admirable open door of his heart and spirit was slammed and soldered shut; and there he stood, arms tightly folded, chin arrogantly thrust out, Mussolini... not the mature man of moderate mind.
From: "Spark" le Klaus
Sent: Monday, June 29, 2020 8:34 AM
To: Aging Child
Subject: Re: Tar Nation
So the short answer to my question is yes you would. Theoretical
life trumps ALL other considerations. A perfect example of the utter stupidity
of religion.
Hitler was against abortion too...
From: Aging Child
Sent: Monday, June 29, 2020 10:52 PM
To: Spartacus
Subject: RE: Tarbrushing Only
Spartacus,
my friend, I don't know for certain where you've suddenly broken down inside,
or how you've let it happen to you, but in more than twenty years of email,
phone calls, visits together, music and laughs and hurts shared, and so much
more, you have never attacked my faith, let alone called me a Nazi.
Your
determined, relentless, righteous, superficial crusade directed against me is
utterly out of keeping with the rare character of the man I've long admired.
Your strengths and skills and knowledge I've appreciated and envied and grown
from; your experience and perspective have counseled and helped direct many of
my more-troubled steps.
Of
late your maturity is seemingly out the window, your deep incisive intellect
looks to be silted up to a tiny trickle through a flattened gully, and your
gentlemanly acceptance that many people do not follow your roadmap… appears
utterly snuffed out. Right now you're coming across as a righteous, arrogant,
crybaby know-it-all, uninterested in anyone else's perspective than your own,
certain of all the quick, easy, pat solutions to the world's array of immense
problems, and are utterly disdainful of any other answers to be offered.
Maybe
out of your justifiable anger, frustration, and outrage at the course this
president has taken, you've grown genuinely frightened; are feeling yourself
impotent in the face of a great unconquerable threat. And so, finding yourself
in a tight corner, you have to lash out and attack. That's reptile-brain
reaction and fear moving you, and guiding your keyboard into vitriol, where for
so much of your life there has instead been patience, grown-up reason, and
level-headedness. Your commendable restraint and acceptance are devolving badly
and alarmingly into juvenile cowardice, arms folded, pout on lips, and choosing
personalized tantrum where a deep breath and greater thought and
self-reflection are so truly needed. That's il Duce's pose to threats and fear. It was
never yours.
Here
where you might wisely seize this time of crisis as an opportunity, say, for
patient persuasion, you are persuading only a profoundly troubling perception
that you are not the least interested in a dialog; that you are unconcerned
with a comparison of viewpoints; that your sole focus is the sound of your
breast-beating and righteous posturing. I must posit that you're not reading
anything that I've written because it runs counter to the mantle you've now
chosen to wrap yourself in, and from which you're moved only to take cheap, low-brow potshots.
Right now you are choosing to read and see only what you want to see, and
nothing else is of worth in your little red book. Come on.
I say
that you're much, much better than that. That you're choosing such a low course
tears at my heart, and claws deeply and bloodily at my lifelong respect for
you. That type of closed-minded self-obsession belongs at the far-far right of
the social spectrum, where one finds tea parties, and rifle-toters, and conspiracists, and unyielding hands
clutching unacceptable tokens, such as dixie-flags and hooked crosses. The left-of-center, where you've always stood, is
about open minds, healing, learning, growth, compassion, conciliation,
consensus, common goals and vision — ideals that at the moment you look to have
turned your back on; none of them are evident in the cold, unreasoned words and
stabs you've been mercilessly taking at me from out of the blue.
This
is not the Spartacus I've known and admired and warmly appreciated all these
years. He was never shallow, never self-focused, never narrow of mind, never
brutal, never vicious, never cruel, never demeaning, never sadistic, never
arrogant, never unthinking. What has become of him?
So.
Having once again laid out difficult, yet genuinely respectful, words to stake
out my parcel of parkland, and certain it'll again be bombarded by further
gas-laden shells and jets of flame devouring any waving white flag, let me try once
more to address some things you've said. I know you won't read them because of
who you unaccountably choose to be at this moment; yet respect for you (and for
myself) requires what you've said not be ignored. I challenge you to try the
same.
One.
Life
in the womb is not "theoretical". It is alive now,
today, growing. The child — zygote, embryo, fetus — is not a potential human,
but a human with full potential; from day one, its DNA is fully human and is
neither the mother's nor the father's. Tearing the child out, dismembering her,
decapitating him, because the mother (or/and father) wants to continue living
their shallow self-serving life, is every bit as much murder as choking a baby
in its crib because it's crying in the wee hours; the difference is one of
locale only.
It's
not a religious matter. It's pure, raw, demonstrable science: read an
embryonics textbook. Religion is simply recognition of the value of life. But it's science that tells us that this, the child in the womb, is alive, is life itself.
Having
so easy an out as abortion in a challenging personal situation cheapens the value of life,
and of responsibility, and encourages self-service, rather than devotion to and
love of others. Being okay with still-warm baby body parts, being fine about a
newborn drowned in a bucket in a Planned Parenthood procedure room, means that
some essential part of an adult's heart is dead as well. That's inhuman, and
inhumane. It poisons our entire culture and species. It is monstrous. It has to
end. It brooks no compromise.
Two.
A
common trope is that more wars have been caused, more people have died, because
of religion than from any other cause. Simple, stark counterpoint: which religion was
Hitler pushing? What spiritual faith was Stalin extolling? Which church did Pol Pot fight on behalf of? Which deity commanded those millions upon millions of
deaths? Name the religion. Now name original great Western universities and
hospital systems that were not founded by religious organizations.
"Utter stupidity" in fact lies
demonstrably in the closed mind and unflexing agenda — and it sincerely
troubles me to point out to you that this is the thickest vein coming through
your most recent emails. I repeat, and will keep repeating: you are far better
than that.
Three.
Your
disgust and horror and outrage at the lousy leadership implicit in tens of
thousands of American deaths this year is something I share with you. You're
attacking me because you've personalized your disgust, and thus I
myself must be fully to blame for all those dead countrymen/women, through my
agonized choice behind a closed curtain one November. If mine had been the one
tiebreaking vote that had kept the president's main opponent out of office,
you'd have a case to come at me personally. Since mine wasn't, then you are
honor-bound to track down every person who did not vote for that opponent, and
berate them every bit as rudely and harshly and immaturely as you've been
attacking me; anything less would make a fool and hypocrite out of you…
something else my dear friend Sparks has never been.
Is it
that the only thing you value in someone today is how much they think and act
like you? Where is the mature adult mind in that? Where is the big heart that
embraces the differences in all your fellow humans, inside and out? Since when
were undifferentiated clones your lone company of choice?
If I
am to follow your role model, then, and hold someone solely and unmeritedly,
directly responsible for our present great ills — which is what your latest
very rude and shallow words have been implying — then you must accept that
there is a whole suite of things I am required to coldly and brutally hold you
accountable for, or you are embracing a lousy double standard.
Total
guilt by clear association:
- Other husbands have knocked their
wives' teeth out; you're just as guilty as they, even though you've only
been loving and nurturing to your wife, whom I also respect and regard
highly; you're still guilty for those other women's batterings because
you, too, are a husband, and some husbands see their wives as
punching-bags.
- Every bit of woodworking machinery
used to tear apart a fresh corpse has your fingerprints on it.
- As a man, you're complicit in the rape
of every child.
- As a half-Sicilian, you're also responsible
for every bloody machine-gunning by the Cosa Nostra; and as a half-German, the blood and
ovens of Buchenwald are under your name.
- As a Caucasian, your knee also was on
struggling George Floyd's dying neck.
- As a former-USAF man, you must answer
for every American bomb and cruise missile that leveled a hospital and
took out a school and apartment block.
- As a resident of a super-big metropolitan
area, you're responsible as well for all polluted waters, for stench in
the air, for the dead wilds.
- As a man with a beard, that's you
sitting on a park bench, eying little girls with bad intent.
Please
tell me that the total absurdity of this line of personalized unhelpful
response to evil is coming through.
That
I have to repeat myself about something so basic and obvious underscores, again, that
you're not reading what I've been writing, nor care to. Yet out of love for
you, and of unyielding appreciation for all our years, I'll say it again. I did
not put this man into office so that he could kill tens of thousands of
Americans. The virus that took them was all but nonexistent three and a half
years ago; the lousy decisions and nondecisions that exacerbated the plague had
not been made. A vote for any candidate is never carte blanche for them to run
roughshod over their people.
You
have set yourself on a crusade; stop battering your lance and sword on this
weathered windmill that is me. What are you personally doing to actually solve
this problem? How does shamefully kicking into pitiable ruins a long and deep
friendship… redress all the flu-dead? How does that shallow, immature, cowardly
betrayal put Trump and his cronies in their proper, deserved places?
I
repeat as well: you've personalized your outrage and fear, and are taking
repeated aim at an easy target. That's part of why I regretfully have to assert
"cowardly" of you, even though till now you've never been a coward.
Get
in your car and drive your roiling sense of injustice to Washington DC, to 1500
Pennsylvania Avenue, and raise a placard so big and bright that Agent Orange
himself can see it, and don't stop until he's on a rail, in tar and feathers,
being held down under the waters of the Tidal Basin. Engage your legislators
and local electorate to tear them out of office, to sell off all his holdings
in full recompense to the parents and children and brothers and sisters of all
the dead. Put on some scrubs and volunteer in a hospital, a testing center, a
funeral home, and stick with it until the virus and the president are dead and
gone.
All
those would be worthwhile and honorable, positive channels for you to leverage
your great anger and justifiable sense of absolute mission, and sensibly put
them toward righting what's badly awry. To instead take the easy, lazy, arrogant,
cowardly path of visiting it all on an aging child here at his dilapidated
desk, is immensely dishonorable, shameful, unmanly, immature, and disgusting.
It is being a pompous, self-righteous playground bully. That's not Spartacus.
Make a real difference, not the futile, fruitless,
whining, bitter, baby's tantrum you're veering into.
You
are far, far better than that… or used to be. I hold you to a much higher
standard, one that long inspired and encouraged me. That's Spartacus: hope, not
hatred; hand out, not fist drawn; peace, not petty pugilism.
Be
your best. That is the man to admire and emulate.
Regards,
Agïng
Child
Whatever Happened to Spartacus? (part 6)
(part 1)
(part 2)
(part 3)
(part 4)
(part 5)
Overlooking everything I'd shared with him at length in my note, about personally and professionally meeting the virus; about seeing to my mother's (and fellow frail seniors') needs under that virus; and about a possible ray of hope amid it all – even the just-passed (and for now postponed) Fathers' Day, let alone my family's grief at the recent untimely death of our cousin... overlooking all of this, Sparks had leapt onto a negligible, small piece of my brief afterword, rewritten and recast it, adding an incendiary layer on politics and racism. Where had that come from?
So I took a deep breath, and began the first of three further responses to him that would each be the product of many hours of hard thought, rewrites, and conscious effort to make sure I wasn't directly critical of him in any way – we'd been friends for quite a long time, and knew each other well... didn't we? Weren't we?
There must be no possibility of his mistaking my meaning again. So I took pains to lay out that viral-spreading worry of mine in far greater detail, stressing that I didn't – don't – "demonize" the most-recent protestors, and underscoring as well my full support for their cause. The timing of these protests was tragic, in that they were certain to lead to increased death. I explained that I did find the protests' swerve into violence greatly disturbing, unacceptable, and utterly at odds with protesting in peace for a just grievance – which the movement had. Had had.
Concluding my long note to him, I wrote – and I believe this with all my heart: "Black lives matter. All life is sacred and precious and must be protected and nurtured. The life of a helpless man of color whose neck is under the knee of a coldhearted bigot; the lives of each person in CoViD's relentless crosshairs; the lives of children in the womb; the lives of senior citizens warehoused and forgotten – these matter. And the loss of even one is indeed needless."
His terse reply came in the next afternoon. Once again, he ignored everything I'd worked hard to lay out and explain for him, instead shallowly seizing on a lone piece of one concluding sentence, twisted it utterly out of shape and context, and swung it hard across me like a steaming tarbrush:
To: Aging Child
Subject: Re: "Not a Single Sparrow Falls to the Ground, Without..."
How ironic. So many "good, conscientious" people of faith helped elect 2 monsters in order to theoretically protect theoretical life, but instead of protecting life, their words and actions have resulted in the very real death and destruction of countless lives of actual people. After 3+ years of daily increasing horror and debacle, will you remain a "good Catholic" and help re-elect them if your bishop tells you to?
Okay. Now I had to push back – without losing my cool, and my decades of respect for him. This outright rudeness and hostility was completely out of keeping with how we'd always interacted, and with how he dealt with other people; again, he truly has a big and compassionate heart. It took me over five hours to write and hone an answer that addressed his bitter, near-irrational, veering screed.
Where had it come from?
I was hurt, and worried... and had an idea about the cause behind his bizarre, unfathomable twist. I have never known anything to frighten him or even bring him heavy anxiety, beyond what each man – especially husband and father and breadearner – must confront. Here though, even in his tightly secure home, he was vulnerable to a killer virus that could not be negotiated with or beaten back, could only be – hopefully – held at bay with mask and gloves and buckets of sanitizer and a couple injections and an abundance of social caution. He could only hope it wouldn't catch him and kill him, or his wife, or his children, or all of them. Beyond that, and his few basic safeguards, he was powerless and impotent.
Our Spartacus spent years in the military. If he couldn't stop this direct assault, he could still track down and eliminate its cause, and save this country greater harm. And that's a noble line of response. Could he have concluded, in some bizarre, twisted way, that I myself must be the cause of all the "increasing horror and debacle", because I hadn't voted against the current administration, whose response to the virus had been woefully inadequate?
I signed off with an apt quote from Chesterton – a writer he's read and respects:
Sent: Sunday, June 28, 2020 6:55 PM
To: Spartacus
Subject: RE: Tar Nation
Whoah, whoah; down boy!
Spark, please don't take your frustration and anger and justifiable rage at this administration out on me. My vote three and a half years ago was to keep a committed baby killer out of office; it wasn't a mandate for her opponent to kill some 125,000 Americans through arrogance and indifference.
The administration's bullheaded obliviousness to the virus, as threat and grim reaper, has been a heavy factor in all those deaths. So has our culture's, and individual people's, own stubbornness and wishful thinking in the face of the threat and its horrid toll. It is not okay yet to go back to the beach, the coffee shop, the crowded department store.
My daughters, my mother, my pastor, my bishop, my pope, even Jesus Christ Himself, does not pull my strings, let alone my election-booth levers. I vote by my conscience, which is informed by my faith, which holds all life as sacred and deserving of nurturing, protecting, and improving.
So: let's change the 2016 election, and put Trump's main opponent into office instead. Let's say she took heavy-handed steps against the virus early on, and kept the mortality rate closer to Germany's of some 5% – not bloody likely in our culture, so let's assume a 7% mortality rate, still, rather than the current almost-16% (as of 4:33 this afternoon). And let's assume half as many positive cases at this point – again, not likely; the lion's share of the vectors aren't under federal control, short of breaking out the brown shirts and goose-steps.
That would yield about 400,000 domestic positives so far (versus the actual 805,000+), and some 20-30,000 Americans dead. Is that a number you could be happy with? You'd be content that 30,000 Americans would now be dead under her administration? Or is your contention that a different backside in the oval office would have kept the virus out of this country entirely, and there'd be zero deaths stateside, while the rest of the world is bulldozed into mass graves?
125,000 deaths is unacceptable. 20-30,000 is unacceptable. 104 dead Australians is unacceptable.
During the prior administration, this country averaged over 2,700 babies murdered in the womb daily: nearly 8,000,000 from 2013-2018 – these are Guttmacher numbers... and gut-wrenching numbers as well.
That's what I voted against: a world where it's okay to kill a baby, and okay to kill a senior citizen, an invalid; where life is cheap, and is measured only by its convenience to someone else who has the power to take it away mercilessly and without a second thought.
Out of faith, out of valuing the lives of the oldest and youngest and most vulnerable, I made the only sane and compassionate choice I could make, short of withholding my vote entirely (and thus failing of my civic duty), or selecting a less-distasteful candidate, who hadn't a chance of defeating the pro-abortion juggernaut.
And I'm as aggravated as you with nearly everything Trump and his yes-men and -women have done with their executive power in the maddening span since. He has also defunded abortion organizations domestic and international, and pushed back prior regulations requiring religious organizations to provide abortion and related services, a violation of the free-exercise clause of the First Amendment.
All this does not excuse or make acceptable his willful ignorance in the extent of the death and damage this pandemic has brought our country. It does not; nor am I a supporter of anything he or his people do that is not good for Americans collectively and individually. To assume otherwise of me is to blindly wield a tarbrush as wide and indiscriminate as any that's disgustingly used on the far right. You are better than that, and I've always liked that about you.
Spartacus, my friend, please take a deep breath, and step back. I'm not Donald Trump; I'm not anywhere in his corner of lowbrow kowtowers. Please hold fast to your very own commendable words and outlook, that "the most horrific thing about the pandemic has been the perversion of an existential threat against all of humanity into a partisan political issue".
Nobody said it was easy. It's not; I know.
Mïchael
The world pays a compliment to the Catholic Church by not tolerating in her all the transgressions that the world willingly tolerates everywhere else. — G. K. Chesterton
Whatever Happened to Spartacus? (part 5)
From: "Spark" le Klaus
Sent: Saturday, June 27, 2020 4:34 PM
To: Aging Child
Subject: Re: Cheese pasta?
Sent: Saturday, June 27, 2020 8:06 PM
To: Spartacus
Subject: RE: "Not a Single Sparrow Falls to the Ground, Without..."
Sparky, I apologize if anything in my wording even suggested an
impression that I demonize our protestors. When I wrapped up my last note, I
was wringing my fretful hands over the likelihood that the virus had been given
fresh vulnerable victims, with so many short-sighted people rushing back to the
pre-CoViD status-quo world of close physical association (especially
unprotected). And: too many marching folks have been shoulder-to-shoulder
without masks and with too little caution, even while pushing hard to resolve
and redress a long-overdue injustice.
I strongly support this hard thrust against racism in our
country and culture, and my heart is marching with our brothers and sisters out
there in the street. I'm also apposed to disbanding police forces en masse, and
to the use of a legitimate social demonstration as an opportunity to smash and grab.
You and I know that this is utterly antithetical to the committed method of civil
disobedience that Martin Luther King insisted on. Just by association, that
violence dishonors both the movement itself, and specifically King's values and
teachings.
Much of the violence has been instigated by a) arguably criminal
opportunists; and b) anarchists seizing a spotlight and soapbox. Both groups,
especially the latter, care far more for their own personal (and/or collective)
gain than they do for generations of bloodied racial and social grievance long
in need of resolution.
The timing – regardless of any commendable objective or
execrable antisocial agenda – is absolutely lousy, with our being in the midst
of an incurable plague/epidemic/pandemic. This morning's number of forty-some
thousand new U.S. cases of CoViD was the highest single-day jump we've seen
since the beginning of the health nightmare. And much of the cause of that huge
spike lies in just what I was feeling very edgy over: protest-mobbing, and
social-center reopening.
Most certainly a hefty chunk of the blame lies in Trump's
pathetic response, in his arrogance and determined obliviousness; I'm with you
there, and my blood truly heats up at the opportunities he and his
administration have had to do great good and achieve profoundly wondrous
results… and done nothing with those opportunities, or/and made the
worst-possible response when those opportunities were clearly there
(underscoring how he and his backbone-less boys aren't my boys). This morning,
I saw a big fat pickup truck that was flying a huge Trump flag, and I was
disgusted.
I'm totally with you, too, in how "the most horrific thing
about the pandemic has been the perversion of an existential threat against all
of humanity into a partisan political issue" – even where some of our
words, mine and yours alike, themselves veer into the partisan political; we
need to remain on guard against that. This virus and its great threat to every
one of us on this globe most decidedly isn't political. It could unify all of
us in goal and purpose and ultimate achievement. But we've grown too
inflexible, divisive, and entitlement-focused. We have become a stupid people,
sheeple and lemmings.
Black lives matter. All life is sacred and precious, and must be
protected and nurtured. The life of a helpless man of color whose neck is under
the knee of a coldhearted bigot; the lives of each person in CoViD's relentless
crosshairs; the lives of children in the womb; the lives of senior citizens
warehoused and forgotten – these matter. And the loss of even one is indeed needless. These
lives I treasure and support and pray for and march for, and with… even when
the current viral world requires us to march socially distant, march while
sheltering in place.
Stay healthy and vigilant, my friend! LeRoux was right: nobody said it was easy.
Regards,
Gene
By the rivers of Babylon, we sat down and wept when we remembered Zion; and we hung up our
harps on the aspens of that land. There our captors asked us for the lyrics of
our songs, and our tormentors urged us for joy: "Sing for us a song of
Zion!" But how could we sing a song of the Lord in a strange land? — Psalm
137:1-4
More soon; again, I did have to point out to him – very, very, gently, and just in passing – that his political comment had made the high standard of his last sentence profoundly hypocritical. His next reply would shock me with its direct and unprecedented hostility; we've never been at odds, all these years… although he had chewed me out over my vote in the previous election.
Whatever Happened to Spartacus? (part 1)
Both readers of this long-running (and at times long-dormant) blog
likely remember many-years' friend Spartacus. A quick visit to the searchbox there on this page's northwest corner will turn up a warm number of times where he's very illuminatively weighed
in on something I've passed along here, or has himself shared something of
particular note. He's even taken the blog's mike – well, keyboard – more than
once. Go ahead; check 'em out.
We met in elementary school more years ago than I can believe, and
with mutual friend Eileen were the Huey, Dewey, and Louie of the playground.
Then after just a couple fun and busy years, Spart's family moved a number of
state lines away, and after a few letters we fell out of touch.
About three decades later (that can't be right), I located him
online and reached out... and in a particularly short time we were close friends all over
again. I found him to be sharp-minded, knowledgeable among a dizzyingly wide range of
fields, including avionics and history of both Europe and of music. He is
skilled in a number of art media, from intricate model aircraft, to palette and
canvas, to fine-crafted (and rough-hewn) wood, to electronic music, and far
more yet. I admire (and have envied) these exceptional skills... and have very
few equivalents of my own.
We found ourselves on largely parallel paths politically as well,
pitched well to the left of center: distrustful of entrenched politicians;
advocate of the overlooked and underrepresented; anti-NRA, anti- big-business,
anti-conservative, and so on. Economically, he considered himself an
anarcho-syndicalist, while I was beginning to discover distributism.
And thus we were for a good many more years, buddies over the
miles and internet, armchair scientists (and SF-readers), fellow snarkers via
email, occasionally visiting each other's homesteads and families, and sharing
tales of respective journeys and discoveries, and the every-so-often off-color chuckle.
Yet at the time that our now-adult friendship began to coalesce,
my Catholic faith was returning to me, and vice-versa. Over the succeeding
years it continued to deepen and flesh out, and enrich and inform and direct my
inner life and values... in turn directing my outer actions.
Spartacus is (I believe) agnostic, and distrustful of organized
religion... and I can't blame him, given the wealth of religious hypocrites and
the hypocrisy of the wealthy "religious". Throughout nearly all our
modern-years' friendship, he has been especially polite and respectful in regards to my
ever-deepening faith, keeping his own read and opinion silently to himself.
This was very rare to find, and I appreciated it. Nor has it ever been in my
nature be a proselytizer, so I had no sense that what my heart had come to
embrace could come across to him as obnoxious.
The growth in me of faith led to a shift in how I applied it to
the world around me, most especially socially and politically. I was proud to
have voted – twice – for an African-American for president, even while finding
a growing discomfort within at how closely the Democratic Party, and seemingly
its entire slate, from Commander-In-Chief to downtown dogcatcher, had blindly and resolutely aligned
itself with values and objectives I could no longer align myself with, not
and be the Catholic I wanted and needed to be. I've been a registered Democrat
since my late teens, but, to paraphrase St. Thomas More, I am the king's good
servant – and the Lord's first.
One of those troubling political thrusts is abortion... and long
before Barack Obama finished out his second term, I realized I simply could no
longer mark the ballot checkbox next to any candidate supporting that issue. At
some other place on this blog, I'd like to detail why it's glaringly clear that
abortion is cold-hearted infanticide, hand-in-glove with racism and entrenched
political misogyny. Right now, and in immediately following posts, we're
looking at a maelstrom-sized, inexplicable sea-change in a greatly valued friend, man, buddy...
and that same rich and world-spanning sea turned shallow and stagnant and
unnavigable.
And so at the next election – 2016 – I greatly wanted to cast my vote for the country's first major-party woman candidate for president... and simply could not. The alternative was to not vote, which would be to abandon my social duty, or to select another candidate. Decades ago, faced with a similar pair of unpalatable opponents, my father defiantly wrote in Mickey Mouse on his ballot.
I considered that, but chose instead to vote for the candidate
most likely, if possible, to beat the former First Lady... and that happened
to be the arrogant, pompous, womanizing jerk Donald Trump – who had also come down firmly
on the pro-life side, where I myself was anchored. So come election day, I
pinched my nose hard enough that it nearly bled, and pulled his box's lever.
We know how that election turned out; more later.

