Monday, March 14, 2022

Whatever Happened to Spartacus? (part 7)

(part1)
(part 2)
(part 3)
(part 4)
(part 5)
(part 6)

Clearly decades-long friend Spartacus was not in the least interested even in my direct answers to his coldly hostile questions... let alone the reasoning that undergirds my perspective.

He didn't want a dialog. He wanted only to attack, to beat his chest and bellow as king of the hill... while standing in a cesspit. His lifelong open-mindedness was gone; his patient manner had evaporated; his respect for others wrenched into a whip, a goad, a dagger in the back, a sickening fecal firehose on full power.

He responded the next morning to my long, sincere note, where I'd outlined areas I both in fact agreed with him on, and where his vaunted stance was weak, deficient, and unsustainable... and he would have none of it. The admirable open door of his heart and spirit was slammed and soldered shut; and there he stood, arms tightly folded, chin arrogantly thrust out, Mussolini... not the mature man of moderate mind.

From: "Spark" le Klaus
Sent: Monday, June 29, 2020 8:34 AM
To: Aging Child
Subject: Re: Tar Nation

So the short answer to my question is yes you would. Theoretical life trumps ALL other considerations. A perfect example of the utter stupidity of religion.

Hitler was against abortion too...

My previous reply had gotten nowhere; now, in replying yet again, I would have to repeat a number of things I'd already said clearly – and respectfully – as well as push back even harder... again without taking my gloves off or stepping away from being a patient and respectful gentleman. Something had clearly snapped inside my close friend Spartacus, and I would need to address that, too, and fairly directly. I would lighten things up and counterbalance it all by continuing to sincerely compliment him overall – and point out the terrible contrast between where he was now, and how he always had been. 

From: Aging Child
Sent: Monday, June 29, 2020 10:52 PM
To: Spartacus
Subject: RE: Tarbrushing Only

Spartacus, my friend, I don't know for certain where you've suddenly broken down inside, or how you've let it happen to you, but in more than twenty years of email, phone calls, visits together, music and laughs and hurts shared, and so much more, you have never attacked my faith, let alone called me a Nazi.

Your determined, relentless, righteous, superficial crusade directed against me is utterly out of keeping with the rare character of the man I've long admired. Your strengths and skills and knowledge I've appreciated and envied and grown from; your experience and perspective have counseled and helped direct many of my more-troubled steps.

Of late your maturity is seemingly out the window, your deep incisive intellect looks to be silted up to a tiny trickle through a flattened gully, and your gentlemanly acceptance that many people do not follow your roadmap… appears utterly snuffed out. Right now you're coming across as a righteous, arrogant, crybaby know-it-all, uninterested in anyone else's perspective than your own, certain of all the quick, easy, pat solutions to the world's array of immense problems, and are utterly disdainful of any other answers to be offered.

Maybe out of your justifiable anger, frustration, and outrage at the course this president has taken, you've grown genuinely frightened; are feeling yourself impotent in the face of a great unconquerable threat. And so, finding yourself in a tight corner, you have to lash out and attack. That's reptile-brain reaction and fear moving you, and guiding your keyboard into vitriol, where for so much of your life there has instead been patience, grown-up reason, and level-headedness. Your commendable restraint and acceptance are devolving badly and alarmingly into juvenile cowardice, arms folded, pout on lips, and choosing personalized tantrum where a deep breath and greater thought and self-reflection are so truly needed. That's il Duce's pose to threats and fear. It was never yours.

Here where you might wisely seize this time of crisis as an opportunity, say, for patient persuasion, you are persuading only a profoundly troubling perception that you are not the least interested in a dialog; that you are unconcerned with a comparison of viewpoints; that your sole focus is the sound of your breast-beating and righteous posturing. I must posit that you're not reading anything that I've written because it runs counter to the mantle you've now chosen to wrap yourself in, and from which you're moved only to take cheap, low-brow potshots. Right now you are choosing to read and see only what you want to see, and nothing else is of worth in your little red book. Come on.

I say that you're much, much better than that. That you're choosing such a low course tears at my heart, and claws deeply and bloodily at my lifelong respect for you. That type of closed-minded self-obsession belongs at the far-far right of the social spectrum, where one finds tea parties, and rifle-toters, and conspiracists, and unyielding hands clutching unacceptable tokens, such as dixie-flags and hooked crosses. The left-of-center, where you've always stood, is about open minds, healing, learning, growth, compassion, conciliation, consensus, common goals and vision — ideals that at the moment you look to have turned your back on; none of them are evident in the cold, unreasoned words and stabs you've been mercilessly taking at me from out of the blue.

This is not the Spartacus I've known and admired and warmly appreciated all these years. He was never shallow, never self-focused, never narrow of mind, never brutal, never vicious, never cruel, never demeaning, never sadistic, never arrogant, never unthinking. What has become of him?

So. Having once again laid out difficult, yet genuinely respectful, words to stake out my parcel of parkland, and certain it'll again be bombarded by further gas-laden shells and jets of flame devouring any waving white flag, let me try once more to address some things you've said. I know you won't read them because of who you unaccountably choose to be at this moment; yet respect for you (and for myself) requires what you've said not be ignored. I challenge you to try the same.

One.

Life in the womb is not "theoretical". It is alive now, today, growing. The child — zygote, embryo, fetus — is not a potential human, but a human with full potential; from day one, its DNA is fully human and is neither the mother's nor the father's. Tearing the child out, dismembering her, decapitating him, because the mother (or/and father) wants to continue living their shallow self-serving life, is every bit as much murder as choking a baby in its crib because it's crying in the wee hours; the difference is one of locale only.

It's not a religious matter. It's pure, raw, demonstrable science: read an embryonics textbook. Religion is simply recognition of the value of life. But it's science that tells us that this, the child in the womb, is alive, is life itself.

Having so easy an out as abortion in a challenging personal situation cheapens the value of life, and of responsibility, and encourages self-service, rather than devotion to and love of others. Being okay with still-warm baby body parts, being fine about a newborn drowned in a bucket in a Planned Parenthood procedure room, means that some essential part of an adult's heart is dead as well. That's inhuman, and inhumane. It poisons our entire culture and species. It is monstrous. It has to end. It brooks no compromise. The struggle against the abortion-minded is a human-rights struggle.

Two.

A common trope is that more wars have been caused, more people have died, because of religion than from any other cause. Simple, stark counterpoint: which religion was Hitler pushing? What spiritual faith was Stalin extolling? Which church did Pol Pot fight on behalf of? Which deity commanded those millions upon millions of deaths? Name the religion. Now name original great Western universities and hospital systems that were not founded by religious organizations.

"Utter stupidity" in fact lies demonstrably in the closed mind and unflexing agenda — and it sincerely troubles me to point out to you that this is the thickest vein coming through your most recent emails. I repeat, and will keep repeating: you are far better than that.

Three.

Your disgust and horror and outrage at the lousy leadership implicit in tens of thousands of American deaths this year is something I share with you. You're attacking me because you've personalized your disgust, and thus I myself must be fully to blame for all those dead countrymen/women, through my agonized choice behind a closed curtain one November. If mine had been the one tiebreaking vote that had kept the president's main opponent out of office, you'd have a case to come at me personally. Since mine wasn't, then you are honor-bound to track down every person who did not vote for that opponent, and berate them every bit as rudely and harshly and immaturely as you've been attacking me; anything less would make a fool and hypocrite out of you… something else my dear friend Sparks has never been.

Is it that the only thing you value in someone today is how much they think and act like you? Where is the mature adult mind in that? Where is the big heart that embraces the differences in all your fellow humans, inside and out? Since when were undifferentiated clones your lone company of choice?

If I am to follow your role model, then, and hold someone solely and unmeritedly, directly responsible for our present great ills — which is what your latest very rude and shallow words have been implying — then you must accept that there is a whole suite of things I am required to coldly and brutally hold you accountable for, or you are embracing a lousy double standard.

Total guilt by clear association:

  • Other husbands have knocked their wives' teeth out; you're just as guilty as they, even though you've only been loving and nurturing to your wife, whom I also respect and regard highly; you're still guilty for those other women's batterings because you, too, are a husband, and some husbands see their wives as punching-bags.
  • Every bit of woodworking machinery used to tear apart a fresh corpse has your fingerprints on it.
  • As a man, you're complicit in the rape of every child.
  • As a half-Sicilian, you're also responsible for every bloody machine-gunning by the Cosa Nostra; and as a half-German, the blood and ovens of Buchenwald are under your name.
  • As a Caucasian, your knee also was on struggling George Floyd's dying neck.
  • As a former-USAF man, you must answer for every American bomb and cruise missile that leveled a hospital and took out a school and apartment block.
  • As a resident of a super-big metropolitan area, you're responsible as well for all polluted waters, for stench in the air, for the dead wilds.
  • As a man with a beard, that's you sitting on a park bench, eying little girls with bad intent.

Please tell me that the total absurdity of this line of personalized unhelpful response to evil is coming through.

That I have to repeat myself about something so basic and obvious underscores, again, that you're not reading what I've been writing, nor care to. Yet out of love for you, and of unyielding appreciation for all our years, I'll say it again. I did not put this man into office so that he could kill tens of thousands of Americans. The virus that took them was all but nonexistent three and a half years ago; the lousy decisions and nondecisions that exacerbated the plague had not been made. A vote for any candidate is never carte blanche for them to run roughshod over their people.

You have set yourself on a crusade; stop battering your lance and sword on this weathered windmill that is me. What are you personally doing to actually solve this problem? How does shamefully kicking into pitiable ruins a long and deep friendship… redress all the flu-dead? How does that shallow, immature, cowardly betrayal put Trump and his cronies in their proper, deserved places?

I repeat as well: you've personalized your outrage and fear, and are taking repeated aim at an easy target. That's part of why I regretfully have to assert "cowardly" of you, even though till now you've never been a coward.

Get in your car and drive your roiling sense of injustice to Washington DC, to 1500 Pennsylvania Avenue, and raise a placard so big and bright that Agent Orange himself can see it, and don't stop until he's on a rail, in tar and feathers, being held down under the waters of the Tidal Basin. Engage your legislators and local electorate to tear them out of office, to sell off all his holdings in full recompense to the parents and children and brothers and sisters of all the dead. Put on some scrubs and volunteer in a hospital, a testing center, a funeral home, and stick with it until the virus and the president are dead and gone.

All those would be worthwhile and honorable, positive channels for you to leverage your great anger and justifiable sense of absolute mission, and sensibly put them toward righting what's badly awry. To instead take the easy, lazy, arrogant, cowardly path of visiting it all on an aging child here at his dilapidated desk, is immensely dishonorable, shameful, unmanly, immature, and disgusting. It is being a pompous, self-righteous playground bully. That's not Spartacus. Make a real difference, not the futile, fruitless, whining, bitter, baby's tantrum you're veering into.

You are far, far better than that… or used to be. I hold you to a much higher standard, one that long inspired and encouraged me. That's Spartacus: hope, not hatred; hand out, not fist drawn; peace, not petty pugilism.

Be your best. That is the man to admire and emulate.

Regards,

Agïng Child

This time, Sparks actually did not respond, and it was a little while before I heard from him again... attacking me from a new angle. (Why?) Before I lay out his next thudding steps, though, I want to dig deeper into how I responded to him here, and earlier, and contrast it with his own bullied tunnel-vision thrusts. Stay tuned.

No comments:

Post a Comment