Here's a long-due followup,
folks… and I still don't have all the info on the matter as I
want.
I reprinted here a few weeks ago an article on
over-the-line words by Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi, whom I regard and
respect highly. And I mentioned that "I have a later article (9/18/08) that states
Pelosi did agree to meet with Niederauer." I've been hoping for further backup to
follow on that, but haven't seen anything… so here's what I've got so far. Catholic
News Service (CNS) first posted this article on September 10; I caught an
abbreviated version in an archdiocesan newspaper.
The text is reprinted (i.e.,
copied without permission – though with apologies to any legalities-stickler)
directly from the CNS site; I'll stick my neck out further by including first
the copyright information. I'm doing so because I want to get this article out,
and to a few more sets of eyes, and not leave the Speaker hanging, so to speak:
Copyright
(c) 2008 Catholic News
Service/USCCB. All rights reserved.
This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or otherwise distributed.
CNS · 3211 Fourth St. NE · Washington DC 20017 · 202.541.3250
This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or otherwise distributed.
CNS · 3211 Fourth St. NE · Washington DC 20017 · 202.541.3250
Further personal disclosure:
Joe Biden may be considered a friend of the family, in that my late uncle and
aunt (who lived in Delaware for decades) would over many years visit and meet
with him with some regularity, and their daughter – my cousin, of course –
worked closely with the Senator on his presidential bid, and (I assume) is
still professionally associated with him.
I also disagree with his
slight weaseling out of his own "Meet the Press" question: it's not
just personal judgment, Joe. (I do, still, quite look forward to his taking the
helm as vice-president in January. He is good… and, yes, a politician.)
Here follows the article;
readers may notice that some of its text repeats portions of Dan Morris-Young's
earlier article:
Pelosi agrees to meet
archbishop; Biden remarks also draw criticism
By Catholic News Service
By Catholic News Service
SAN FRANCISCO (CNS) --
Responding to an invitation to meet with him to discuss church teaching on
abortion and other topics, U.S. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said she would
"welcome the opportunity" to meet with Archbishop George H. Niederauer
of San Francisco "to go beyond our earlier most cordial exchange about
immigration and needs of the poor to church teaching on other significant
matters."
In a letter delivered to
Archbishop Niederauer Sept. 5, Pelosi offered to "meet at your earliest
convenience" to discuss a statement by the archbishop that said Pelosi's
remarks were "in serious conflict with the teachings of the Catholic
Church" on abortion, the beginning of human life and the formation of
conscience.
But the furor that arose after
Pelosi said on NBC's "Meet the Press" Aug. 24 that church leaders for
centuries had not been able to agree on when life begins received further fuel
Sept. 7 when Sen. Joseph Biden, the Democratic vice-presidential nominee,
responded to a similar question on "Meet the Press."
Biden, who like Pelosi is a
Catholic, said he accepted Catholic teaching that life begins at conception but
did not believe that he could impose his beliefs in the public policy arena.
"I'm prepared as a matter
of faith to accept that life begins at the moment of conception," he said.
"But that is my judgment. For me to impose that judgment on everyone else
who is equally and maybe even more devout than I am seems to me is
inappropriate in a pluralistic society."
Biden's remarks drew an almost
immediate response from Archbishop Charles J. Chaput and Auxiliary Bishop James
D. Conley of Denver, who said in a Sept. 8 "notice to the Catholic
community in northern Colorado" that the Delaware senator "used a
morally exhausted argument that American Catholics have been hearing for 40
years: i.e., that Catholics can't 'impose' their religiously based views on the
rest of the country."
But, they said, "all law
involves the imposition of some people's convictions on everyone else. That is
the nature of the law.
"American Catholics have
allowed themselves to be bullied into accepting the destruction of more than a
million developing unborn children a year," the notice added. "Other
people have imposed their 'pro-choice' beliefs on American society without any
remorse for decades."
Archbishop Niederauer said in
his Sept. 5 statement that he regretted addressing the issue so publicly,
because Pelosi -- a Democrat who represents the San Francisco area -- has been
a dedicated public servant who has promoted some legislation that is in line
with the social teachings of the Catholic Church.
"But the widespread
consternation among Catholics made it unavoidable," he added.
Archbishop Niederauer told
Catholic San Francisco, the archdiocesan newspaper, Sept. 9 that his office
would be "comparing calendars" with Pelosi's office to schedule a
private meeting.
The archbishop said reaction to
his statement had been "mostly positive."
"People have said they
feel it said what needed to be said," he added.
Cardinal Justin Rigali of
Philadelphia and Bishop William E. Lori of Bridgeport, Conn., chairmen of the
U.S. bishops' pro-life and doctrine committees, respectively, had criticized
Pelosi Aug. 25, saying she "misrepresented the history and nature of the
authentic teaching of the Catholic Church on abortion."
Since the first century, the
church "has affirmed the moral evil of every abortion," the two
chairmen said.
The two chairmen also issued a
lengthy critique of Biden's comments Sept. 9, saying that "the obligation
to protect unborn human life rests on the answer to two questions, neither of
which is private or specifically religious."
The first question is when
human life begins, they said, adding it is a matter of "objective
fact," taught in embryology textbooks, that life begins at conception. The
second, "a moral question, with legal and political consequences," is
which human beings "should be seen as having fundamental human rights,
such as a right not to be killed," they added.
"We have no business
dividing humanity into those who are valuable enough to warrant protection and
those who are not," Cardinal Rigali and Bishop Lori said. "Such views
pose a serious threat to the dignity and rights of other poor and vulnerable
members of the human family who need and deserve our respect and protection."
The U.S. bishops'
Administrative Committee, meeting in Washington Sept. 10, endorsed the views
expressed by Cardinal Rigali and Bishop Lori and said, "As the teachers of
the faith, we also point out the connectedness between the evil of abortion and
political support for abortion."
The full body of bishops will
"discuss the practical and pastoral implications of these serious
matters" when they meet in Baltimore Nov. 10-13, the Administrative
Committee said.
Archbishop Niederauer said many
Catholics "have written me letters and sent me e-mails in which they
expressed their dismay and concern about the speaker's remarks."
"Very often they moved on
to a question that caused much discussion during the 2004 campaign: Is it
necessary to deny holy Communion to some Catholics in public life because of
their public support for abortion on demand?" he added.
Church leaders should be
cautious when making judgments about who is worthy of receiving holy Communion,
he said.
"The practice of the
church is to accept the conscientious self-appraisal of each person" when
he or she approaches for Communion, Archbishop Niederauer said.
Bishop Michael J. Sheridan of
Colorado Springs, Colo., took a stronger position in a statement issued Aug.
26.
"Those Catholics who take
a public stance in opposition to this most fundamental moral teaching of the
church place themselves outside full communion with the church," he wrote
in his statement, "and they should not present themselves for the
reception of holy Communion."
(I will have more to say on this
issue – from my viewpoint as Democrat, liberal, and penitent Catholic.)
In the "Meet the
Press" interview, Pelosi said specific considerations must be undertaken
during each trimester of a child's development before an abortion can be
performed.
"This isn't about abortion
on demand. It's about careful, careful consideration of all factors ... that a
woman has to make with her doctor and her God," she said, adding that her
goal is to make abortion safe and rare while reducing the number of abortions
nationwide.
Though critical of Pelosi's
statements and stands on abortion and other life issues, Archbishop Niederauer
described the member of St. Vincent de Paul Parish in San Francisco as "a
gifted, dedicated and accomplished public servant" who "has stated
often her love for her faith and for the Catholic Church."
In her response, which Pelosi
released to the media, she thanked the archbishop for his "gracious
remarks regarding my love for the Catholic Church and my Catholic faith."
Contributing to this story was
Dan Morris-Young in San Francisco.
No comments:
Post a Comment