I mentioned last week how some email correspondence has had me contemplating (and
pontificating on) the nature of relationships, particularly one-on-one, marital
(or marriage-bound) relationships. I did want this once, very badly – as I
think Erich Segal once said, while too many married men wish they were single
again, I as a single man long wished to be married again.
Almost twenty years ago, and for a handful of too-brief years
afterward, I had the opportunity – and encouragement from her – to do so, and
should have, should have, should have. But I was utterly stupid, stubborn, and
selfish. And that door closed for me for good almost fifteen years ago, with me
weeping on my daughter's shoulder in an airport, an intercontinental jet having
just disappeared from view, taking my heart with it.
But never mind the melancholia; I carry that regret to the
grave, its impact has shaped the course of my life from that day (before,
actually), and its effect has left my heart unable to reciprocate fairly,
considerately, and openly with a loving woman (and – at least for me – men are
out of the question).
So in my own personal terms, as I've mentioned before, my
mind and heart and soul are set on the priesthood, or avowed religious (i.e.,
monk/brother), and I've simply no intention of another such relationship. I can't
absolutely assure the universe that a bolt out of the blue won't strike me, and
have me taking vows of a very different sort. And women are still beautiful.
But… I want to give more, and to many more, than I could
through marrying… and the shambles I was quickly left with, those two times I
gave dating a try again since that airport afternoon, have shown me that I can't
and shouldn't so give myself away. So I closed the door some years ago.
This I find a relief… and all of womanhood agrees.
About a week and a half ago, Sharon – a Jewish friend of
some years – sent me the following email:
Sent: Thursday,
April 26, 2007 2:45 PM
Subject: Question
Subject: Question
Hi
AC, I've a question for you. If you were looking to date again, are there
certain requirements you would want; i.e., skinny, Catholic? Reason I'm asking
is I work with a woman who is Catholic and she's looking to meet someone. Like
me she works for [a contractor] but at [our company's] office in [a nearby town]. Anyway,
she's not skinny, which is why I'm asking. Anyway, just thought I'd ask.
Sharon
Sharon
Bless her furry heart! I answered, most gently (knowing I'd
mentioned a desire to take religious vows):
Subject: RE:
Possible/Partial Answer
Hi, Sharon!
Out of curiosity more than
interest, I've sometimes surfed the Craig's List personals (most of which are
spam). Most of the "W4M" ads seem very superficial, or too vague. Yet
on the other hand, I suspect most men are very unrealistic in their
expectations.
If I were to date again (and I do
consider it, but never for long anymore), I know I would be most keen that my
victim / brave soul / girlfriend be Catholic (for commonality of faith
tradition), or possibly Jewish (for tradition, heritage, and because Judaism
has always interested me), since I'd be dating with the objective of finding a
life-partner, a la Lennon's "Grow old along with me".
But this is behind me; I have to focus on my soul now, not my heart.
If a man in his 30s or 40s, or
older, took the time to really think about it realistically, he'd pretty
quickly toss the dream of a Pamela Anderson type. We
can't live off fantasy any more than we can live healthfully off a diet of
steak and ice cream. So both man and woman would have to be cautious (both
likely to have been burnt in their own pasts), yet also willing to go out on a
limb with honesty: "take me as I am", yet even more so "I want
to be better, inside and out… and want someone to grow with".
She should look for a man who is
okay with admitting he has flaws in figure, marriage, employment, and so on.
Not a real loser, of course, but someone who accepts he is less than perfect,
though unwilling to accept that learning and improving are all behind him.
Thus by the same token she should
be up front that she's not Twiggy (if anyone remembers her
anymore), or Calista Flockhart… yet is also far more than any
outward appearance, and does not kowtow to any man's (or woman's) superficial
standards. It's healthy, and future-forward focused, to want to better oneself
in more than just income… and I find this attractive, and suspect a sensible
man would as well. If she sees her flaws, then she's less likely to expect her
man to live on his own pedestal.
She might get even more mileage
if while being honest about her build/figure, she not focus too greatly on it…
and also show a sense of humor (we men desperately need this in our women!)
about it. In that vein, I think I'd advertise myself as a "Tigger spirit
in a Winnie-the-Pooh body"… except I do usually wear
pants out in public. So perhaps she could say she'd "totally failed the
Rosie O'Donnell test for reasons of my sweet nature, not figure". (A mere
"BBW" says too little.)
Other ideas: "Roseanne Barr
without the mouth"; "handyman special"; "a real loving
armful"; "just you try wrapping your arms around me!"; and so on
– the idea being, of course, to be upbeat, versus beat up.
I hope some of this helps!
AgingChild
And she answered:
Sent: Thursday,
April 26, 2007 4:06 PM
Subject: RE: Possible/Partial Answer
Subject: RE: Possible/Partial Answer
Hi
Acey, Thanks for the information. I think she will find it very
informative. I told her a bit about you and thought I'd try, though I also did
mention that you are considering the monastery at some point.
How
are things going otherwise with you?
Thank
you,
Sharon
Sharon
Yielding this last from me…
Sent: Thursday,
April 26, 2007 4:48 PM
Subject: RE: Possible/Partial Answer
Subject: RE: Possible/Partial Answer
Quite fine; thanks! I really
appreciate the "plug" (not to make light at all of your
intentions!!). Sometimes I almost wish I could be "available", but I
really want to be part of something bigger and greater than any one other
person. It sounds like a cheesy cliché to say this, but I want to give what I
am and what I know and what I feel… to a whole billion people, and more.
And I continued with a brief summary of my 5K-trudge in
Pennsylvania, before signing off:
Anyway, take care… me, I'm still
catching my breath!
AgingChild
It still feels dismissive, you know. I do appreciate that a
matchmaker considered me… and a little bit of me inside actually hurts, having
turned the unknown woman away by gently pointing out that closed door – when
for so much of the last thirty years I longed to be half of a whole, and had
left the same door wide open, waiting.
Now so open a door would be too distracting: the noise of
traffic and feet passing by outside, wind blowing dried leaves (and spring
tree-blossom-petals!) and litter and rain and snow and startled birds in.
Still, the curtains are pulled back, and I keep a light on.
But it's so I can better see what I'm doing. And whenever I wish, I still can
look out the window.
Lovely out there. Now, back to work.
No comments:
Post a Comment